Occasional thoughts of an Anglican Episcopal priest

Category: Church (Page 108 of 116)

From the Daily Office – March 9, 2012

The Psalmist wrote….

When my mind became embittered, *
I was sorely wounded in my heart.
I was stupid and had no understanding; *
I was like a brute beast in your presence.
Yet I am always with you; *
you hold me by my right hand.
You will guide me by your counsel, *
and afterwards receive me with glory.
Whom have I in heaven but you? *
and having you I desire nothing upon earth.
Though my flesh and my heart should waste away, *
God is the strength of my heart and my portion for ever.

(From the Daily Office Lectionary, Mar. 9, 2012, Psalm 73:21-26 [BCP translation])

Psalm 73 begins with a confession of green-eyed envy; the Psalmist acknowledges that he slipped and nearly stumbled away from faith because of his envy of the prosperous who “suffer no pain” and whose “bodies are sleek and sound.” This psalm brings in to sharp focus a complex and perplexing problems for persons of faith: the prosperity of the wicked and the suffering of the righteous. The Psalmist saw that “the wicked, always at ease, increase their wealth;” the wicked seem to be totally self-reliant and autonomous people. They seem not to need God; they are able to take care of themselves. It bothered the Psalmist that their lifestyle apparently works! Thus, he concluded that the attempt to lead a moral life is absolutely pointless; he despaired that it was in vain that he kept his heart clean and “washed my hands in innocence.” However, upon entering the temple he came to understand that the wicked wealthy will “come to destruction, come to an end, and perish from terror!” And so he comes to sing of his reliance on God, his strength and his portion for ever. At the end of the psalm, he vows to “speak of all God’s works in the gates of the city of Zion.” ~ In our society with such a deep division between rich and poor, between “the 1%” and the middle class, this psalm’s cries of envy and despair, I’m sure, speak to many, but I hope its reliance on the God of eternity, the God of hope speaks louder. “Whom have I in heaven but you? And having you I desire nothing upon earth.” The Psalmist, entering the sanctuary and changing his point of view from the worldly to the eternal, was led to see that no matter how things looked here in the temporal world his trust and confidence in God was the greatest gift of God’s grace, greater than any earthly wealth he could contemplate. A change of perspective, so that one views life through the lens of eternity, brings clarity of vision, both of the world around us and of our call to ministry in this world. It does not permit us to become embittered with green-eyed envy nor to sink into despair, but neither does it encourage us to accept wealth inequality and injustice with a promise of “pie in the sky by-and-by.” Rather, it admonishes us to “speak of all God’s works in the gates of the city.” And as St. Thomas Aquinas reminds us, “Mercy and truth are necessarily found in all God’s works” and “justice must exist in all God’s works.” (Summa Theologica, Question 21, Article 4) Psalm 73 in the Daily Office Lectionary during Lent echoes the exhortation of the Prophet Micah: “He has told you, O mortal, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?” (Micah 6:8)

From the Daily Office – March 8, 2012

Jesus said….

With what can we compare the kingdom of God, or what parable will we use for it? It is like a mustard seed, which, when sown upon the ground, is the smallest of all the seeds on earth; yet when it is sown it grows up and becomes the greatest of all shrubs, and puts forth large branches, so that the birds of the air can make nests in its shade. (From the Daily Office Readings, Mar. 8, 2012, Mark 4:30-32)

When I think about religion and trees, I remember that Evelyn Underhill, writing not about this parable but about St. Paul’s prayer in the Letter to the Ephesians that the church might be “rooted and grounded in love” (Eph. 3:17), wrote: “By contemplative prayer, I do not mean any abnormal sort of activity or experience, still less a deliberate and artificial passivity. I just mean the sort of prayer that aims at God in and for Himself and not for any of His gifts whatever, and more and more profoundly rests in Him alone: what St. Paul, that vivid realist, meant by being rooted and grounded. When I read those words, I always think of a forest tree. First of the bright and changeful tuft that shows itself to the world and produces the immense spread of boughs and branches, the succession and abundance of leaves and fruits. Then of the vast unseen system of roots, perhaps greater than the branches in strength and extent, with their tenacious attachments, their fan-like system of delicate filaments and their power of silently absorbing food. On that profound and secret life the whole growth and stability of the tree depend. It is rooted and grounded in a hidden world.” (Quoted in Radiance: A Spiritual Memoir of Evelyn Underhill, Bernard Bangley, ed. [Brewster, MA: Paraclete Press, 2004]). We see the tree, its trunk, its branches, its leaves; below in the soil, however, there is a huge unseen network of roots. Love and prayer are the earth which nourishes these roots. Referring Ms. Underhill’s metaphor to Jesus’ parable of the mustard seed, and understanding (as one interpretation of the image) the “kingdom of God” analogized to the tree which grows from it to be the church, we are left with the unmistakeable inference that it is our prayer life which provides the fruitful ground in which the church must grow. I am reminded of a story told by Martha Grace Reese in her book Unbinding the Gospel (Atlanta, GA: Chalice Press, 2008) that when she was consulted by a church growth committee and asked what they should do, she told them to do nothing but pray for at least three months. And I remember another church leader saying, “This year’s level of church growth cannot be sustained on last year’s level of prayer.” Active, sustained, community-wide prayer is an absolute necessity for the church to grow into the abundant, live-giving place where “the birds of the air can make nests in its shade.” The parable challenges us with the idea that God created the church (us) for the birds (those who are not us). Are our churches, through our love and prayers, places where the birds (the ones who are not us, may not be at all like us) can come and abide? Let us pray that they are.

From the Daily Office – March 7, 2012

Jesus said….

The sower sows the word. These are the ones on the path where the word is sown: when they hear, Satan immediately comes and takes away the word that is sown in them. And these are the ones sown on rocky ground: when they hear the word, they immediately receive it with joy. But they have no root, and endure only for a while; then, when trouble or persecution arises on account of the word, immediately they fall away. And others are those sown among the thorns: these are the ones who hear the word, but the cares of the world, and the lure of wealth, and the desire for other things come in and choke the word, and it yields nothing. And these are the ones sown on the good soil: they hear the word and accept it and bear fruit, thirty and sixty and a hundredfold. (From the Daily Office Readings, Mar. 7, 2012, Mark 4:14-20)

Priests and preachers are sowers of the seeds of the gospel, but we are called to do more than simply cast the seed on the ground. Many of us are called to the additional tasks of clearing rocks, tilling the soil, watering and fertilizing, fencing the field, pulling weeds, chasing away pests, and so forth. Paul wrote to the Corinthians, “I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth. You [the church or the unchurched in the mission field] are God’s field.” (1 Cor. 3:6,9) He might have carried the analogy further (as I have done). The analogy breaks down, of course, because weed-choked soil cannot relieve itself of weeds nor can rocky soil relieve itself of stones, but human beings influenced by “the cares of the world, and the lure of wealth, and the desire for other things” can turn from these things. The Lenten “fast” is a time and a mechanism whereby we may make the conscious effort to do so.

From the Daily Office – March 6, 2012

Paul wrote….

Clean out the old yeast so that you may be a new batch, as you really are unleavened. For our paschal lamb, Christ, has been sacrificed. Therefore, let us celebrate the festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. (From the Daily Office Readings, Mar. 5, 2012, 1 Corinthians 5:7-8)

Only a little bit of yeast is necessary to leaven a whole batch of dough. In ancient Judaism, leaven could not be offered on the altar: “No grain offering that you bring to the Lord shall be made with leaven, for you must not turn any leaven or honey into smoke as an offering by fire to the Lord.” (Leviticus 2:11) Although this prohibition is repeated elsewhere, the Hebrew Scriptures not say why leaven is forbidden. A popular theory is that it is because leaven spoils and corrupts. The Babylonian Talmud uses the image of “yeast in the dough” as a metaphor for “the evil impulse, which causes a ferment in the heart”; the commentary in the Anchor Bible refers to leaven as “the arch-symbol of fermentation, deterioration, and death and, hence, taboo on the altar of blessing and life.” St. Paul, steeped as he was in Jewish learning, used leaven as a metaphor for sin and its insidious ability to infect an entire community such as a church congregation. No amount of sin may be safely tolerated in the community of faith for sin spreads. So our Lenten discipline of self-examination must include an evaluation of our church communities and, says Paul, if we find any among us who is “sexually immoral or greedy, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or robber” we are to “drive out the wicked person from among [us].” These are harsh words that Paul quotes from several places in the Book of Deuteronomy, e.g., Deuteronomy 17:7; 19:19; 21:21. We should temper his admonition with the encouragement of Christ in Matthew’s Gospel: “If another member of the church sins against you, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone. If the member listens to you, you have regained that one. But if you are not listened to, take one or two others along with you, so that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If the member refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if the offender refuses to listen even to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.” (Matt. 18:15-17) Correction is always preferable to expulsion! As the Ash Wednesday absolution in The Book of Common Prayer reminds us, God’s preference is that sinners “turn from their wickedness and live.” During this Lent, clean out the old leaven of malice and evil, and encourage one another to keep in mind “the need which all Christians continually have to renew their repentance and faith.”

From the Daily Office – March 5, 2012

Paul wrote….

We are fools for the sake of Christ, but you are wise in Christ. We are weak, but you are strong. You are held in honor, but we in disrepute. To the present hour we are hungry and thirsty, we are poorly clothed and beaten and homeless, and we grow weary from the work of our own hands. When reviled, we bless; when persecuted, we endure; when slandered, we speak kindly. We have become like the rubbish of the world, the dregs of all things, to this very day. (From the Daily Office Readings, Mar. 5, 2012, 1 Corinthians 4:10-12)

In this bit from his First Letter to the Church in Corinth, St. Paul nails the Corinthians with sarcasm. Apparently they had been bickering among themselves about who was the most spiritually advanced and some had even boasted that they had grown beyond their teachers, Paul and Apollos. So Paul sardonically congratulates them that they have already achieved every spiritual goal and climbed every spiritual mountain. Paul cynically suggests that he wishes to ride their coattails into glory without the painful cost of obedience that mere mortals must pay. I admire Paul’s willingness to be confrontational with this congregation, but I often find myself unable to do so in my own ministry setting – and I would suspect that I am not alone among clergy. Influenced as we are by our society’s consumer mentality it is all too easy to analyze and evaluate our ministries according to some standard of marketability, but a priest must never forget that popularity with a parish is not proof God’s favor and blessing; clergy are accountable to God not to some corporate-culture inspired performance evaluation. We must struggle not to substitute human approval for obedience to God. In the end, this is true of everyone, not just of clergy. During these weeks in which we are invited “to the observance of a holy Lent, by self-examination and repentance,” it is well to ask who it is we are trying to please, the world around us or God?

Balancing the Details & the Bigger Picture – Sermon for Lent 2B

Revised Common Lectionary for the Second Sunday in Lent, Year B: Genesis 17:1-7, 15-16; Psalm 22:22-30; Romans 4:13-25; and Mark 8:31-38

This is the second Sunday on which I will answer some of the questions put to me by members of the congregation. We had several detailed questions asked about the liturgy so I deal with those as a group today.

One question was, “Why are different colors used throughout the church year and what do they mean?” We use colors in our worship because color is expressive and reflective of mood and meaning. William Temple, former Archbishop of Canterbury whom I quoted last week, is frequently quoted as having said, “Christianity is the most materialistic religion in the world.” What he means, of course, is that Christians acknowledge that God made the world of matter, the world of things, and that the world of matter is essentially good, as God pronounced it in the creation story in Genesis 1. “All things bright and beautiful…The Lord God made them all” the children’s hymn declares. Since God made them and declared them good, we are to receive all that God has made with thanksgiving. We are to enjoy it all for as long as we have breath. Part of that enjoyment is using and appreciating the many colors of the rainbow in our worship.

At the present time, the most commonly found color sequence used in churches of all denominations is that of the Roman Catholic Church, with white, red, green, and purple as the principal colors. Lutherans and Anglicans often add blue to this list, and some congregations make use of scarlet or “blood red” during Holy Week. Blue is used in the Advent as symbolic of hope. White is used at Christmas and Easter, at other Feasts of the Lord, and on the feasts of saints who were not martyred as symbolic of light, joy and purity; sometimes gold is used as an alternative to white. Red is used at Pentecost to symbolize the flames of the Holy Spirit and on the feasts of martyrs to symbolize the blood they shed for their faith. Purple is used in Lent as symbolic of mourning and repentance. Purple may also be used in Holy Week, or scarlet or the blood red Lenten array, a reminder of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross, may be used. The “neutral color” used during the Sundays of Ordinary Time following the Epiphany and following Pentecost is green, which symbolizes growth. This general color scheme has been followed in most English churches since the 16th Century and, thus, in most Episcopal parishes since the founding of our province of Anglicanism after the Revolutionary War.

Another parishioner asked why I raise my hands at certain points, or bow at others, or genuflect, or make the sign of the cross; in other words, why do we Episcopalians, and in particular the clergy, make so much use of our bodies in worship? My mother, who was reared in a tradition where one entered the church and sat down and didn’t move until the service was over, often asked this question. Rather than answer with regard to each specific movement, and there are detailed reasons for each, let me answer in general that we worship with our bodies, not just with our minds or our hearts. Just as Jesus was God “embodied” in human flesh, so we are both spirit and flesh. The guiding principle behind all ritual gestures and movements is the idea of the incarnation. In the incarnation we believe that God took a human body in Jesus of Nazareth and lived a human life among us in that body, so what we do with our bodies is important.

The old rule in the Episcopal Church used to be “Stand to sing, sit to listen, kneel to pray.” But liturgical scholars tell us that until the late Middle Ages and even into the Reformation, people stood to pray, often raising their hands to heaven. So now The Book of Common Prayer (1979) generally lists standing before kneeling as the preferred option for prayer. Standing, it has been said, is more a corporate posture; kneeling, a private one.

The most specific question I got was from someone who drew a picture (of a host with a wedge-shaped piece broken out) and asked, “Why do you hold up the Host like this?” This is an ancient tradition in the church going back into the early Middle Ages, if not to the very origins of the eucharistic liturgy. In our eucharist, the large host is broken (the breaking of the bread symbolizes the death of Jesus) and what is called the “fraction anthem” is said, usually “Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us.” After the People’s response, as all present are invited to receive Communion, the Bread and the Chalice are displayed, the two halves of the Host rejoined symbolizing the Resurrection; they are shown by the missing “wedge” to have been broken as a memorial of Christ’s wounds shown to St. Thomas to prove that our Lord had been crucified and raised from the dead.

None of these things, in and of itself, is terribly important. Whether the presiding clergy wears green or blue or some other color really doesn’t matter. Whether he or she bows or not at a particular moment or makes the sign of the cross at a specific time really doesn’t matter. Whether we chant a part of the service or not really doesn’t matter. How the presider invites the People to receive the Sacrament really doesn’t matter. At least, taken individually they don’t really matter … but taken as a whole they are very important … the whole is greater than the some of its parts, and if we change or abandon any of the parts, we should do so carefully and with understanding of what we are doing.

A friend of mine recently told me about a problem she has with her sister-in-law. “When my sister-in-law cooks,” she said, “she likes to substitute ingredients for those in the recipe. One time I gave her the recipe for a chicken-and-walnut dish that her husband, my brother, likes, and she served it one night when I was over. In place of walnuts, she had used raw peanuts. And for chicken, she had substituted beef. In fact, every major ingredient had been replaced. ‘This is terrible!’ my brother said after one bite. My sister-in-law glared at me across the table and said, ‘Don’t blame me! It’s your sister’s recipe!’”

Replacing even one ingredient in a recipe can have significant effect on the whole dish. As the Hindu philosopher Sivananda once said,

A mountain is composed of tiny grains of earth. The ocean is made up of tiny drops of water. Even so, life is but an endless series of little details, actions, speeches, and thoughts. And the consequences whether good or bad of even the least of them are far-reaching.

Details are not simply picky details; they are important. The award-winning furniture designer Charles Eames once remarked, “The details are details. They make the product. It will in the end be the details that give a product its life.”

Doing liturgical worship is like following a recipe. Liturgy invites participants to worship God holistically, with body, mind, and spirit. Sometimes worship is reduced to the intellect, but God invites us to worship more fully. Participants in liturgical worship with all its colors, gestures and movement are more than an audience, more than mere spectators; they are celebrants. While our intellects may be engaged by a sermon, our bodies usually are not, but in liturgical worship, our bodies and senses are fully engaged. Our bodies participate along with our minds and spirits through physical acts of bowing and genuflecting, crossing ourselves, rising and coming forward to receive Communion. Like the individual ingredients in a recipe, none of these elements alone is terribly important; working together, they combine into something of great beauty.

The senses are engaged through visual means in art, candles, colors, symbols, and ritual gestures, through the smell and smoke of incense, through the hearing and singing of music and bells, through taste and touch of Communion and the Sacraments. All of these invite us to lift up our hearts, minds, and bodies to God in praise, adoration, and worship. A part of worshiping God liturgically includes our obedience to St. Paul’s mandate to “offer yourselves as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to the Lord” (Romans 12:1). When we worship God in a liturgical setting, we are honor this admonition; we see and take part in the bigger picture. In this way, liturgy is symbolic of everyday life; not content to be mere audience, simply spectators, liturgical worshipers are participants and celebrants.

Which brings me to today’s story from the Gospel according Mark. Jesus has taken Peter, James, and John up the Holy Mountain and they have seen him transfigured. As they proceed from there to Jerusalem, he has asked them who people think he is and, more pointedly, who they think he is; Peter has exclaimed, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the Living God!” (Matthew 16:16; Mark 8:29) Now, continuing their journey, he is teaching them what that means, giving them the big picture, as it were, but Peter gets hung up on the details and protests. “Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him,” but Jesus (perhaps anticipating the modern notion that “the Devil is in the details”) replies, “Get behind me, Satan.” He will not let Peter’s temptation to focus on and amend a detail derail the bigger plan. “You are setting your mind on human things (the minor details), not on divine things (the big picture).” (Mark 8:32-33)

Jesus then calls all the disciples and others in the crowd to join them and says, “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” (Mark 8:34) What, he asks them, will if profit anyone to gain the world (mere details) at the cost of their life (the big picture). Australian theologian Bill Loader says of this story:

These verses have caused considerable confusion in Christian spirituality. Who is doing what? Which self am I denying? With which self am I doing the denying? Is it a matter of not doing what I want to do – for a while, perhaps during Lent – only then to return to myself? Is it saying I need to hate myself or, at least, constantly put myself down – or, if I want to make a good impression, keep doing so when others are listening. It is little wonder that many people have been confused by the rules of the game. (First Thoughts on Year B Gospel Passages from the Lectionary)

People get confused because we are all often like Peter, focusing on details and failing to see the big picture. And yet, if we look only at the larger vision paying no attention to its parts, we can fail to reach the goal. Major league catcher Rick Dempsey, who played for a lot of teams but mostly for the Baltimore Orioles, once said that good baseball players can’t think about the big questions like winning the World Series or winning a long string of games. He said that a good catcher has to break the game down to its smallest parts: one game, one inning, one pitch at a time. “If you’ll play it one pitch at a time, you’ll eventually look up and see that you won the game.” (Story related by Kyle Childress in Following Jesus One Step at a Time)

So it’s something of a balancing act – details balanced with the big picture – seeing the larger vision without losing track of each step necessary to get there. It’s like doing liturgy – we pay appropriate attention to the parts while taking part in the whole, neither focusing too closely on the details nor forgetting about them. And this is the way to make sense of what Jesus says to the crowd in this Gospel lesson.

Jesus calls each of us to take up our cross and follow him; he doesn’t in any way offer to carry our cross for us. Now, please be aware that Jesus is not saying simply, “Deal with the annoying details of your personal life.” Those burdens of our everyday lives are not our “crosses” – if anything they are those thorns in the flesh of which St. Paul complained in the Second Letter to the Corinthians (2 Cor. 12:7). Listen again to Christ’s full statement: “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” It’s not about the little details of our own lives; it is about our service to others. Just as Jesus took up his cross and struggled and suffered for the benefit of others, taking up our cross is about working for the benefit of others.

If Jesus took away our struggles and hard work and suffering on behalf of those around us, he would be taking away the meaning and purpose of our lives, as mysterious and inscrutable as it may all be to us most of the time. He does not call us to take up his cross, but to take up our own, and Jesus’ cross does not take away our crosses. That wasn’t and isn’t what he is about, for that would leave us with nothing meaningful to do.

By calling us into the hard work of a life of purpose, sacrifice, and love for others, Jesus gives us back our lives; he redeems the details of our lives in the context of his larger vision. He saves us from meaningless days and years of having nothing to do but deal with our own petty details. He opens us up to see the needs of the world around us and to respond to them saying, “I’ll do something, because if I don’t no one else will.” He gives us back hard lives that are not merely about our small selves, but about God’s bigger picture.

In our Epistle lesson today (Romans 4:13-25), St. Paul reminds the Roman church and us that we are called to faith in this larger vision, to “being fully convinced that God [is] able to do what [God has] promised.” The great Disciples of Christ preacher Fred Craddock says that St. Paul’s retelling of the story of Abraham “reminds us that God is both the subject and the object of faith. As the subject of faith, God initiates faith. …. And the one who believes is responding to and trusting in the God who calls and [who] promises.” Thus, he says, the example of Abraham provides us a roadmap for the Lenten journey:

For the one who believes in the God who gives life to the dead, the Lenten journey is … a revisiting of one’s own experience. [This] makes the traveler through Lent a pilgrim. Without this faith one is simply a tourist. (Craddock, Lenten Roadmap, The Christian Century, March 8, 2003, p. 18.)

Living the Christian faith is a balancing act – details balanced with the big picture – seeing the larger vision without losing track of each step necessary to get there. In liturgical worship, it calls you to be not merely an audience, but celebrants. In the Lenten journey and throughout life, it calls you to be not merely tourists, but pilgrims; not merely spectators, but participants. So take up your cross and follow Jesus into God’s bigger picture. Amen.

From the Daily Office – March 4, 2012

Paul wrote….

Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? Therefore we have been buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life. For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we will certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his. (From the Daily Office Readings, Mar. 4, 2012, Romans 6:3-6)

This is one of my favorite bits of theology from St. Paul! This portion of the Letter to the Romans is also in the Epistle Lesson for the Great Vigil of Easter in the Episcopal Church’s lectionary. I love the certitude with which Paul writes: “We will certainly by united with him!” For Paul this is incontrovertible! The Greek word translated “certainly” is alla which has the additional meaning of “nevertheless” or “notwithstanding” – in other words, there is nothing that can stand in the way of our resurrection with Christ. I am reminded of another favorite passage from Paul’s letter to the Roman church: “For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor rulers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 8:38-39) As we spend these weeks of Lent in self-examination and introspection, this is well worth remembering. No matter what faults or flaws we may think we find in ourselves, nothing, absolutely nothing can stand in the way of the loving relationship God desires with each of us.

From the Daily Office – March 3, 2012

Paul wrote….

It is the Lord who judges me. Therefore do not pronounce judgement before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then each one will receive commendation from God. (From the Daily Office Readings, Mar. 3, 2012, 1 Corinthians 4:4b-5)

St. Paul gave this assurance of God’s commendation to the Corinthians in a discussion which included this reminder, “For all things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future – all belong to you, and you belong to Christ, and Christ belongs to God. Think of us in this way, as servants of Christ and stewards of God’s mysteries.” (1 Cor. 3:21b-4:1) In other words, it’s all about relationship, and how we manage and maintain our relationships will be the basis of God’s judgment. Eugene Peterson in his The Message paraphrases these words, “You are privileged to be in union with Christ, who is in union with God.” It is our relationship, our union with God in Christ that Paul describes as “God’s mysteries.” I recently read another blogger’s suggestion that the way to enhance intimacy in a relationship was to maintain some mystery in it. I believe that blogger is right and that our mysterious relationship with God is the most intimate relationship possible. Lent is a time to explore the mysteries of your relationship with God in Christ, to bring to light things in darkness and to disclose the purposes of both your heart and God’s.

About the Proposed Episcopal Church Budget

The next General Convention of the Episcopal Church is a year away and, in preparation for the same, a proposed budget has been prepared….

The budget can be found here.

Missing are funds for grants to assist seminarians; missing are funds to assist campus ministries on colleges and universities; missing are funds … for a lot of things. This is clearly not a mission-minded budget. Many of our dioceses are following the same pattern. We are becoming congregational because our leadership is forcing it on us. Without broader, diocesan-wide and church-wide vision, we have to focus entirely on local visioning … to the detriment of our connective catholicity.

This is a very disappointing budget.

From the Daily Office – March 2, 2012

Paul wrote….

Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you? If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person. For God’s temple is holy, and you are that temple. (From the Daily Office Readings, Mar. 2, 2012, 1 Corinthians 3:16-17)

Although I’ve seen this text used (with others) as the foundation for what used to be called “muscular Christianity” (the idea that individual pursuit of physical strength and health are part of the proper Christian life), this text does not state that an individual person is a temple, but rather that a congregation of Christians forms a temple of the Spirit; the pronoun “you” in these verses is in the plural! The first sentence of verse 17 places God’s ultimate condemnation on any individual that damages or destroys a congregation through internal strife or bickering. A congregation of Christians is holy, and its holiness is not to be treated lightly by its members. They should treat one another with respect and dignity, even in the face of disrespect and wrongful treatment. Remember Christ’s admonition to Peter to forgive a brother or sister seventy times seven times. (Matthew 18:22) Paul here shares a metaphor with Peter who wrote to the whole church that all members should, “like living stones, let yourselves be built into a spiritual house.” (1 Peter 2:5) Of course, before stones can be built into a temple, they must be formed and fitted; they must be measured and squared. As living stones, we have the obligation (especially during this season of Lent) to perform this work on ourselves; we are called to do so by responding to God’s grace in Christ Jesus, who is the foundation of our spiritual house, by spiritual growth, faithful living, and testimony to the world. All of that and forgiveness one to another! It is not easy being a living temple! It’s hard work!

« Older posts Newer posts »