Occasional thoughts of an Anglican Episcopal priest

Category: Family (Page 1 of 15)

A Dual-Nature Ordination Anniversary Meditation: June 21, 1996 (Pentecost 4, RCL Year A)

I am not preaching today, the 35th anniversary of my ordination to the priesthood. If I were, I might offer something like this, but then again I might not. These are simply my thoughts apropos of today’s gospel lesson (Matthew 10:24-39) in light of the day. Particularly Jesus disturbing statement, “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword…. and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household.”[1] I would start the sermon with the story of a dog.

In November, 1941, a brick maker named Carlo Soriani found an injured puppy by the side of the road in the village of Luco di Mugello, which is a neighborhood in metropolitan Florence. He took the puppy home, nursed it back to health, and then he and his wife adopted the dog and named it “Fido” (pronouncedo “Fee-doh” in Italian), a name meaning “faithful.”

Mr. Soriani worked at a brick kiln some miles away from his home. Every morning he went to the bus stop at the Piazza Dante in the center of Luco di Mugello accompanied by Fido; he’d get on the bus and Fido would go back home. Every evening, Fido would go to the bus stop and wait for Carlo, and then they’d walk home together. Everybody in Luco di Mugello got to know Fido.

On December 30, 1943, the brick kiln was bombed and Carlo Soriani was killed. That evening, Fido went to the bus stop like he always did, but Carlo didn’t get off the bus. Fido went home, but he returned to the bus stop the next evening to wait and, again, no Carlo. He did it again the next evening, and the next, and the next. Fido went to the bus stop to wait for Carlo every evening for the next 15 years, until he died, at the bus stop, on the night June 9, 1958. Mrs. Soriani buried Fido in the municipal cemetery next to her husban Carlo.

The village erected a statue of Fido at the bus stop in the Piazza Dante which is still there; it bears the legend “A Fido, Esempio di Fedelta (To Fido, Paragon of Faithfulness)”. I learned of Fido and saw his statue when, in June of 1969, I spent part of the summer in Florence with my brother Rick and his wife Jan. They were there because Jan was working on her doctorate in Italian literature; Rick and I went to the Dante Aleghieri Scuola per Stranieri and tried to learn to speak Italian. It was a great summer, one of those formative experiences that stay with you all your days.

Twenty-two years after that summer, as I mentioned before, on June 21, 1991, the Rt. Rev. Stewart Clarke Zabriskie, then Bishop of Nevada, and the college of presbyters of that diocese, laid hands on me and made me a priest. So this is a day of great happiness, because the gift of the priesthood has been a source of profound joy through all these three-and-a-half decades. To share the gospel of love, to preside at the Holy Eucharist, to stand with people at the brightest and at the darkest times of their lives – at weddings, at baptisms, at hospital bedsides, at gravesides – and to offer them God’s blessing and the message of hope; these are the sources of that joy. So today I celebrate.

But it is also an anniversary of profound grief.

Two years to the day after my ordination, Rick, who was my only sibling, died of brain cancer, glioblastoma, the same disease that killed the late Senator John McCain. It’s a horrible disease, invariably fatal. Back when Rick was diagnosed the average lifespan following onset of symptoms was six months; for Rick it was nine. His first signs manifested in October 1992, but were misdiagnosed as a stroke. It wasn’t determined to be cancer until January. When it was, he set himself a goal: to live long enough to see his daughter Saskia, his firstborn, graduate from college, to be there for her on that big day in May. To make that goal required some truly heroic and, frankly, sacrificial palliative measures.

Rick was the vice-president of San Diego State University in California, where he was also Dean of the Faculty and chair of the Department of Political Science. He had authored several books and scholarly articles; he spoke four languages, loved baroque music, read English and French mystery novels, and collected modern art. He gave all that up in order to be with Saskia on her graduation day. To extend his life long enough that he could do so, neurosurgeons excized as much of the tumor as possible, taking a good deal of brain matter with it. He lost much of his memory and his ability to communicate. As the disease progressed, that worsened. The last time I spoke to Rick, just a few days before he died, he couldn’t remember his children’s names; he couldn’t remember the three colors of the lights on traffic signals; he could barely frame even the simplest sentence. The tragic thing was that he knew he used to be able to do all those things and so much more, but he’d given them up to stand with his daughter as she graduated from college. That’s faithful parenting in the face of adversity.

Faithfulness is what Jesus is talking about in today’s story from Matthew’s gospel. When he says these hard and, frankly, harsh words, that he brings not peace but a sword, that because of his gospel there will be conflict within families, that his followers must love him more than they love their parents or their children, that “those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it,”[2] he is talking about what the great German pastor theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer called “the cost of discipleship.”[3] Being faithful to the teaching and example of Jesus of Nazareth is costly. Faithfulness of any kind makes demands; Christian faithfulness demands sacrifice, especially.

For priests, this means giving up a normal life. Our tradition does not demand as much as some others. We are not expected to be celibate and forego the pleasures and demands of marriage and parenthood, but we do give up the idea that our time is our own, the notion that “what we do” is something we can leave behind at 5 o’clock each evening and return to at 9 a.m. the next day, the concept of a “weekend.”

Frankly, we also give up the institution of friendship. Oh, we have colleagues and people to whom we grow close, but my wife once wisely observed a couple of years after I was ordained, “We no longer have friends; we have parishioners.” As much as we protest against it, claiming there is no difference between the laity and the ordained, the truth is that once the bishop lays hands on a person, there is a change in the way one is perceived by others, a change in all your interpersonal interactions. If you don’t believe me, just put on a dog collar for a day and go about your usual activities. People stop telling you risque jokes. They look at you horrified if you utter a curse word, lose your temper, or criticize a politician in public. And if they do any of that, even if you don’t know them, they will turn to you and apologize. The first few times it happens, it’s really weird. Especially when it comes from people whom you’ve known for years!

And it happens not just to you, but to your family. Clergy life is often described as “life in a fishbowl.” Everyone in your parish knows your business, or at least thinks they have a right to know your business (although they may not think you have any right to know theirs). Your social life as a family becomes inextricably tied to your church; you don’t really have much time for one outside the parish. And the result is that you become painfully familiar with the phenomenon of “ghosting.”

You know that is, right? Wikipedia defines it as “the practice of suddenly ending all communication and avoiding contact with another person without any apparent warning or explanation and ignoring any subsequent attempts to communicate.”[4] This is frequently how people leave church congregations. They just disappear. They ghost the pastor and many of the other members. Why did they leave? There are many reasons people stop attending a church: some because they disagree with something that was preached or some position taken by the church or the priest; most for other reasons. But you don’t know. You try to find out; you get rebuffed. You doubt yourself. Was it something you said or did? You feel like Fido, the Italian dog. These people you showed up for, whose weddings you were part of, whose babies you baptized, whose hands you held through illness and the deaths of loved ones and the losses of jobs, for whom you keep showing up, don’t … they don’t show up, and they never do again. And it hurts. Whatever the reason may have been, losing the people you’ve grown to love – especially if it’s by ghosting – hurts!

Like Fido, you keep coming back. You keep waiting for these people who became important to you, but whom you no longer see. Like my brother, you cut away parts of yourself so you won’t feel the pain of the abandonment. Like the person Jesus describes in the gospel lesson, you accept that the person who has ghosted you is no longer part of your church family. You don’t want to think of them as “enemies” (the word Jesus uses in this gospel passage), but the part of your life that they were a part of is lost. Faithfulness to your calling as a priest, faithfulness to Jesus’ gospel, demands that you experience this.

Of course, this is true to some extent of everyone who tries their best to be faithful to Jesus. I’m sure everyone has experienced friends, companions, colleagues, or co-workers who, upon learning of your commitment to your faith, have turned away to one extent or another. We all have to deal with the harsh truth of Jesus’ words.

I remember wondering, as I was preparing for my ordination, why Psalm 43 is appointed for the ordination of a priest because it contains this verse which seems so incongruous, the fifth verse:

Why are you so full of heaviness, O my soul?
and why are you so disquieted within me?

35 years later, after 35 years of showing up and after 33 of these paradoxical anniversaries, I no longer wonder about that.

Faithfulness to Jesus is a source of great joy, but it can be … it will be; Jesus assures us of this … it will be also a source of great pain and profound griet, of great heaviness and enormous disquiet. The dual nature of this anniversary, a celebration of my ordination and the grieving over the loss of my only sibling, reminds me of the sacrifices that faithfulness requires, and keeps me grounded. Instead of wondering about Psalm 43, I find I can pray its last verse with thanksgiving:

Put your trust in God;
for I will yet give thanks to him,
who is the help of my countenance, and my God.[5]

Amen.

====================

This is not a homily. I have, as of early June 2026, stepped aside from prieslty ministry for the time being, so on this anniversary I neither presided nor preached at Sunday worship. This is simply a meditation, written off the cuff, with very little editing.

The illustration is a snapshot of my late brother and me at the reception following my ordination service at Christ Church Episcopal, Las Vegas, Nevada, on June 21, 1991.

====================

Notes:
Click on footnote numbers to link back to associated text. Unless otherwise indicated, all quotations from Scripture are from the New Revised Version Updated Edition.

[1] Matthew 10:34,36

[2] Matthew 10:39

[3] See Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship (Scribner, New York:1963)

[4] Ghosting (behavior), Wikipedia

[5] Psalm 43:5-6 (BCP Version) from The Book of Common Prayer 1979

Tubby & Teeter-Totters – Sermon for RCL Proper 7A

Do any of you know the story of Tubby the Cocker Spaniel? Well . . . remember Tubby’s name. We’ll come back to him, but first let’s put today’s gospel lesson in perspective.

This lesson picks up where last week’s lesson ended. You’ll recall that Jesus is sending the twelve out to do missionary work. “Go,” he tells them “to the lost sheep of the house of Israel . . . proclaim the good news . . . cure the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons.”[1] In last week’s lesson, he warned them that this was not going to be easy, that they would face opposition. In this week’s reading, he continues in that vein and ups the ante, increases the volume: it won’t just be difficult, he says, it’s possibly going to be deadly!

There won’t just be arguments at the Thanksgiving table; there will be fights! Your father or your mother, your sister or your brother . . . they won’t just disagree with you; they will be your enemies; they will try to kill you. “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.”[2]

Continue reading

Fatherhood and Laughter – Sermon for RCL Proper 6A

Our gospel lesson is the shortened version of Jesus’ commission to the twelve as he sends them out to do missionary work. As he continues with their instructions he tells them, “I am sending you out like sheep into the midst of wolves; so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves,”[1] and then he warns them that those who follow him are likely to face all sorts of terrible strife, including bitterness and enmity within families.

“Brother will betray brother to death,” he says, “and a father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death; and you will be hated by all because of my name. But the one who endures to the end will be saved.”[2]

It’s an odd lesson, I suppose, for Father’s Day, but of course Father’s Day isn’t on the church calendar and the Lectionary doesn’t take it into account. It’s simply a coincidence that this lesson about discord between fathers and sons should come up this morning, just as it’s a coincidence that the Old Testament lesson about the promise of a child to the elderly and barren couple Abraham and Sarah should be in the Lectionary rota today.

Continue reading

Answering a Call – Sermon for RCL Proper 5A

“As Jesus was walking along, he saw a man called Matthew sitting at the tax booth; and he said to him, ‘Follow me.’ And he got up and followed him.”[1] Something similar happens in the Genesis reading from the Hebrew scriptures appointed for today: “The Lord said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you.’ * * * So Abram went, as the Lord had told him….”[2]

Abram’s immediate response to God’s call is the subject of Paul’s comments in the Epistle reading from the Letter to the Romans. Abram believed God, believed in God, and acted on that belief, and that combination of belief and action is what Paul refers to as faith and that “faith ‘was reckoned to him as righteousness.’”[3]

Continue reading

“The Light of World” – Sermon for the Fourth Sunday of Easter, RCL Year B (and Mother’s Day)

Peter Blume, Light of the World, 1932A few years ago, at my former parish, we had a Sunday school presentation in which each of the kids was to recite a verse of Scripture. On little guy came up and just stood there, shuffling his feet and looking very uncomfortable; he just couldn’t remember his line… His mother was in the front row to prompt him. She gestured and formed the words silently with her lips, but it did not help. Her son’s memory was blank. Finally, she leaned forward and whispered the cue, “I am the light of the world.” The child beamed and with great feeling and a loud clear voice said, “My mother is the light of the world.”

Today, we have the happy coincidence of celebrating Mother’s Day and contemplating another of Jesus famous “I am” statements: “I am the good shepherd.” I believe that this coincidence can help us to understand this famous metaphor. Last Monday was the feast of Julian of Norwich, the early 15th Century mystic who was given, and recorded, a series of “divine shewings.” In her text, The Revelations of Divine Love, published in modern translation under the title Showings, she wrote this:

The human mother will suckle her child with her own milk, but our beloved Mother, Jesus, feeds us with himself, and with most tender courtesy, does it by means of the Blessed Sacrament, the precious food of all true life.[1]

A clergy person of my acquaintance, following Julian’s vision of Jesus as our “beloved mother,” recast today’s Gospel lesson in terms of motherhood, rather than shepherding.

Continue reading

Until 2 a.m. – A Poem

Human conversation
does not travel
from A to B to C
in a neat and orderly fashion.

It starts at A
heading in the direction of B
but takes a detour to A-prime
and then to 1
from which it may turn to 1(a)
or possibly to 2.

After touching on 2,
it leaps to Red
and then Green.

Perhaps at this juncture,
it bounds back on track for B,
but when it gets there,
instead of heading in the direction of C,
it may pause and catch its breath.

It may, in fact,
stop
and never seem to get there…

Until 2 a.m.
when the phone will ring
and a voice will say, “C!”

–– C. Eric Funston
29 January 2020

Not Getting It Right: Sermon for Advent 3A (December 15, 2019)

When I was a kid growing up first in southern Nevada and then in southern California, the weeks leading up to Christmas (we weren’t church members so we didn’t call them “Advent”) were always the same. They followed a pattern set by my mother. We bought a tree and decorated it; we set up a model electric train around it. We bought and wrapped packages and put them under the tree, making tunnels for that toy train. We went to the Christmas light shows in nearby parks and drove through the neighborhoods that went all out for cooperative, or sometimes competitive, outdoor displays. My mother would make several batches of bourbon balls (those confections made of crushed vanilla wafers and booze) and give them to friends and co-workers. Christmas Eve we would watch one or more Christmas movies on TV, and early Christmas morning we would open our packages . . .  carefully so that my mother could save the wrapping paper. Then all day would be spent cooking and watching TV and playing bridge. After the big Christmas dinner, my step-father and I would do the clean up, my brother and my uncle would watch TV . . . and my mother would sneak off to her room and cry. You see . . . no matter how carefully we prepared, no matter how strictly we adhered to Mom’s pattern, something always went wrong. We never got it right; Christmas never turned out the way my mother wanted it to be.

Some years later, I read the work of the Israeli poet Yehuda Amichai and I understood what our family problem was.

Continue reading

Balance: The Episcopal Anglican “Distinctive”

Two things happened last Saturday.

Early in the day I got into an internet discussion (in a Facebook comment thread) with a friend about the “distinctives” of the Episcopal Church and (as the context broadened) Anglicanism in general. It started as a joke when I made a snarky comment that what sets us apart from other parts of the Christian world is that we are a “place” where people can argue about such important things as candles on the altar or processional crosses or the theology of bread with vile, soul-crushing vehemence and still claim to be loving brothers and sisters. My friend responded, I answered, and as things progressed I realized he was being serious while I was trying to be sarcastic. I shifted gears and we ended up agreeing that the Anglican distinctive is difficult to put into words, it almost defies definition.

And, yet, there is something! We had both commented during the give-and-take that there is a je-ne-sais-quoi about our tradition that we miss when attending worship in another church , that if the Episcopal Church did not exist we would have to invent it.

Continue reading

On Leaving Facebook

I have a friend whose face I have seen only in photographs. We have never been in the same room; we have never shaken hands; we have never spoken. Nonetheless, I have considered this person a friend for many years. We met (if that’s the right word) through a listserve of Episcopalians and Anglicans many years ago and continued our friendship when most of that group migrated to Facebook. A couple of months ago, I noticed that my friend had stopped posting to Facebook. I tried to contact them[1], but notes sent by Facebook Messenger were never answered and they never responded when “tagged” in Facebook posts; I could not post directly to my friend’s wall, or so Facebook informed me. Eventually, it appeared my friend’s Facebook account was either deactivated or deleted. I did not have a phone number or an email address for them, so I was left in the dark as to what had happened to my friend.

Continue reading

Abortion. Choice. Business.

I love you, mostly. You’re my friend. But you posted a Facebook meme that’s been going around. It reads:

“Just because I am pro-choice does not mean I am pro-abortion. It means I understand your choice is none of my fucking business, and I will always fight for your right to choose.”

I understand and at a certain level agree with this, but deep down inside, in the painful pit where the embryo my girlfriend and I aborted forty years ago still lives, I hate you for saying that the choice we made was “none of your fucking business!”

Continue reading

« Older posts