Occasional thoughts of an Anglican Episcopal priest

Category: BCP (Page 1 of 6)

A Dual-Nature Ordination Anniversary Meditation: June 21, 1996 (Pentecost 4, RCL Year A)

I am not preaching today, the 35th anniversary of my ordination to the priesthood. If I were, I might offer something like this, but then again I might not. These are simply my thoughts apropos of today’s gospel lesson (Matthew 10:24-39) in light of the day. Particularly Jesus disturbing statement, “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword…. and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household.”[1] I would start the sermon with the story of a dog.

In November, 1941, a brick maker named Carlo Soriani found an injured puppy by the side of the road in the village of Luco di Mugello, which is a neighborhood in metropolitan Florence. He took the puppy home, nursed it back to health, and then he and his wife adopted the dog and named it “Fido” (pronouncedo “Fee-doh” in Italian), a name meaning “faithful.”

Mr. Soriani worked at a brick kiln some miles away from his home. Every morning he went to the bus stop at the Piazza Dante in the center of Luco di Mugello accompanied by Fido; he’d get on the bus and Fido would go back home. Every evening, Fido would go to the bus stop and wait for Carlo, and then they’d walk home together. Everybody in Luco di Mugello got to know Fido.

On December 30, 1943, the brick kiln was bombed and Carlo Soriani was killed. That evening, Fido went to the bus stop like he always did, but Carlo didn’t get off the bus. Fido went home, but he returned to the bus stop the next evening to wait and, again, no Carlo. He did it again the next evening, and the next, and the next. Fido went to the bus stop to wait for Carlo every evening for the next 15 years, until he died, at the bus stop, on the night June 9, 1958. Mrs. Soriani buried Fido in the municipal cemetery next to her husban Carlo.

The village erected a statue of Fido at the bus stop in the Piazza Dante which is still there; it bears the legend “A Fido, Esempio di Fedelta (To Fido, Paragon of Faithfulness)”. I learned of Fido and saw his statue when, in June of 1969, I spent part of the summer in Florence with my brother Rick and his wife Jan. They were there because Jan was working on her doctorate in Italian literature; Rick and I went to the Dante Aleghieri Scuola per Stranieri and tried to learn to speak Italian. It was a great summer, one of those formative experiences that stay with you all your days.

Twenty-two years after that summer, as I mentioned before, on June 21, 1991, the Rt. Rev. Stewart Clarke Zabriskie, then Bishop of Nevada, and the college of presbyters of that diocese, laid hands on me and made me a priest. So this is a day of great happiness, because the gift of the priesthood has been a source of profound joy through all these three-and-a-half decades. To share the gospel of love, to preside at the Holy Eucharist, to stand with people at the brightest and at the darkest times of their lives – at weddings, at baptisms, at hospital bedsides, at gravesides – and to offer them God’s blessing and the message of hope; these are the sources of that joy. So today I celebrate.

But it is also an anniversary of profound grief.

Two years to the day after my ordination, Rick, who was my only sibling, died of brain cancer, glioblastoma, the same disease that killed the late Senator John McCain. It’s a horrible disease, invariably fatal. Back when Rick was diagnosed the average lifespan following onset of symptoms was six months; for Rick it was nine. His first signs manifested in October 1992, but were misdiagnosed as a stroke. It wasn’t determined to be cancer until January. When it was, he set himself a goal: to live long enough to see his daughter Saskia, his firstborn, graduate from college, to be there for her on that big day in May. To make that goal required some truly heroic and, frankly, sacrificial palliative measures.

Rick was the vice-president of San Diego State University in California, where he was also Dean of the Faculty and chair of the Department of Political Science. He had authored several books and scholarly articles; he spoke four languages, loved baroque music, read English and French mystery novels, and collected modern art. He gave all that up in order to be with Saskia on her graduation day. To extend his life long enough that he could do so, neurosurgeons excized as much of the tumor as possible, taking a good deal of brain matter with it. He lost much of his memory and his ability to communicate. As the disease progressed, that worsened. The last time I spoke to Rick, just a few days before he died, he couldn’t remember his children’s names; he couldn’t remember the three colors of the lights on traffic signals; he could barely frame even the simplest sentence. The tragic thing was that he knew he used to be able to do all those things and so much more, but he’d given them up to stand with his daughter as she graduated from college. That’s faithful parenting in the face of adversity.

Faithfulness is what Jesus is talking about in today’s story from Matthew’s gospel. When he says these hard and, frankly, harsh words, that he brings not peace but a sword, that because of his gospel there will be conflict within families, that his followers must love him more than they love their parents or their children, that “those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it,”[2] he is talking about what the great German pastor theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer called “the cost of discipleship.”[3] Being faithful to the teaching and example of Jesus of Nazareth is costly. Faithfulness of any kind makes demands; Christian faithfulness demands sacrifice, especially.

For priests, this means giving up a normal life. Our tradition does not demand as much as some others. We are not expected to be celibate and forego the pleasures and demands of marriage and parenthood, but we do give up the idea that our time is our own, the notion that “what we do” is something we can leave behind at 5 o’clock each evening and return to at 9 a.m. the next day, the concept of a “weekend.”

Frankly, we also give up the institution of friendship. Oh, we have colleagues and people to whom we grow close, but my wife once wisely observed a couple of years after I was ordained, “We no longer have friends; we have parishioners.” As much as we protest against it, claiming there is no difference between the laity and the ordained, the truth is that once the bishop lays hands on a person, there is a change in the way one is perceived by others, a change in all your interpersonal interactions. If you don’t believe me, just put on a dog collar for a day and go about your usual activities. People stop telling you risque jokes. They look at you horrified if you utter a curse word, lose your temper, or criticize a politician in public. And if they do any of that, even if you don’t know them, they will turn to you and apologize. The first few times it happens, it’s really weird. Especially when it comes from people whom you’ve known for years!

And it happens not just to you, but to your family. Clergy life is often described as “life in a fishbowl.” Everyone in your parish knows your business, or at least thinks they have a right to know your business (although they may not think you have any right to know theirs). Your social life as a family becomes inextricably tied to your church; you don’t really have much time for one outside the parish. And the result is that you become painfully familiar with the phenomenon of “ghosting.”

You know that is, right? Wikipedia defines it as “the practice of suddenly ending all communication and avoiding contact with another person without any apparent warning or explanation and ignoring any subsequent attempts to communicate.”[4] This is frequently how people leave church congregations. They just disappear. They ghost the pastor and many of the other members. Why did they leave? There are many reasons people stop attending a church: some because they disagree with something that was preached or some position taken by the church or the priest; most for other reasons. But you don’t know. You try to find out; you get rebuffed. You doubt yourself. Was it something you said or did? You feel like Fido, the Italian dog. These people you showed up for, whose weddings you were part of, whose babies you baptized, whose hands you held through illness and the deaths of loved ones and the losses of jobs, for whom you keep showing up, don’t … they don’t show up, and they never do again. And it hurts. Whatever the reason may have been, losing the people you’ve grown to love – especially if it’s by ghosting – hurts!

Like Fido, you keep coming back. You keep waiting for these people who became important to you, but whom you no longer see. Like my brother, you cut away parts of yourself so you won’t feel the pain of the abandonment. Like the person Jesus describes in the gospel lesson, you accept that the person who has ghosted you is no longer part of your church family. You don’t want to think of them as “enemies” (the word Jesus uses in this gospel passage), but the part of your life that they were a part of is lost. Faithfulness to your calling as a priest, faithfulness to Jesus’ gospel, demands that you experience this.

Of course, this is true to some extent of everyone who tries their best to be faithful to Jesus. I’m sure everyone has experienced friends, companions, colleagues, or co-workers who, upon learning of your commitment to your faith, have turned away to one extent or another. We all have to deal with the harsh truth of Jesus’ words.

I remember wondering, as I was preparing for my ordination, why Psalm 43 is appointed for the ordination of a priest because it contains this verse which seems so incongruous, the fifth verse:

Why are you so full of heaviness, O my soul?
and why are you so disquieted within me?

35 years later, after 35 years of showing up and after 33 of these paradoxical anniversaries, I no longer wonder about that.

Faithfulness to Jesus is a source of great joy, but it can be … it will be; Jesus assures us of this … it will be also a source of great pain and profound griet, of great heaviness and enormous disquiet. The dual nature of this anniversary, a celebration of my ordination and the grieving over the loss of my only sibling, reminds me of the sacrifices that faithfulness requires, and keeps me grounded. Instead of wondering about Psalm 43, I find I can pray its last verse with thanksgiving:

Put your trust in God;
for I will yet give thanks to him,
who is the help of my countenance, and my God.[5]

Amen.

====================

This is not a homily. I have, as of early June 2026, stepped aside from prieslty ministry for the time being, so on this anniversary I neither presided nor preached at Sunday worship. This is simply a meditation, written off the cuff, with very little editing.

The illustration is a snapshot of my late brother and me at the reception following my ordination service at Christ Church Episcopal, Las Vegas, Nevada, on June 21, 1991.

====================

Notes:
Click on footnote numbers to link back to associated text. Unless otherwise indicated, all quotations from Scripture are from the New Revised Version Updated Edition.

[1] Matthew 10:34,36

[2] Matthew 10:39

[3] See Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship (Scribner, New York:1963)

[4] Ghosting (behavior), Wikipedia

[5] Psalm 43:5-6 (BCP Version) from The Book of Common Prayer 1979

E Pluribus Unum: Sermon for Pentecost and Memorial Day, 24 May 2026

Their names were Curtis Adams, Mager Bradley, George Davis, Jr., Thomas Forte, Robert Green, James Leatherwood, Nathaniel Moss, George Motten, William Pritchett, James Stewart, and Due Turner. They came from Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, Texas, Arkansas. Thrown together by war, they were members of the 333rd Field Artillery Battalion, a segregated African American unit serving in Belgium during World War II. When the Germans began what came to be known as “the Battle of the Bulge” in December 1944, the 333rd stayed in place to support the withdrawal of the mostly white infantry regiments around them. These eleven men were captured by the Waffen-SS in a forest near the town of Wereth; they were tortured and murdered, and their bodies left unburied. Although the fact and nature of their sacrifice was well documented, it was never officially recognized by the U.S. government until 2017.[1]

Continue reading

Loneliness and Light: Sermon for 5 Epiphany – 8 February 2026

“You are the light of the world. … [L]et your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father in heaven.”[1]

Last week, I read this story on Facebook:

I own a small bakery. Business has been slow. Rent is up. I was thinking about closing. Last Friday, a teenager came in. He looked nervous. He counted out change for a cookie. He was short 50 cents. “It’s okay,” I said. “Take it.” He ate it at a table, looking at his math homework. I walked over. “Quadratic equations?” He nodded. “I don’t get it.” I sat down and helped him for 20 minutes. He got it. He left smiling. The next day, he came back with two friends. They bought cookies. The day after that, five kids came. Apparently, he told the school, “The lady at the bakery helps with homework.” Now, my bakery is the after-school hang-out spot. It’s loud. It’s messy. There are backpacks everywhere, Yesterday, I found a note in the tip jar. It was wrapped around a $20 bill. “Thanks for helping my son pass math. A Mom.” I’m not closing the bakery. I think I finally found my purpose. It’s not cookies. It’s community.

This baker is a light shining before others. I think that both Jesus and the prophet Isaiah would have approved of this baker.

Continue reading

The Threefold Cord – A Wedding Homily

When a couple gets married in the Episcopal Church, our canon law requires that they spend some time in pre-marital counseling, usually with the priest who will preside at their wedding. That didn’t happen in this case. I’ve spent no time helping P____ and L____ to build a strong foundation for their marriage; we haven’t talked about the theology of Holy Matrimony, or about communication, or conflict resolution skills, or any of the key issues of married life like dealing with finances, children, and extended family. No, my colleague the Rev. Lisa _______ did all of that. She was supposed preside today, but a member of her family announced that they were getting married today, so she asked me to step in, so it’s my privilege to witness and bless P_____ and L_____’s union.

In any event, I know that Mother Lisa has been over all of that with them, so this sermon is not for them. It’s for you, their family and friends; it’s about their marriage, but it’s for you.

If you were raised in the church you probably went through confirmation classes at some point and had to learn some bits of the catechism. You may remember learning about the Sacraments; there are seven of them. Holy Baptism and Holy Communion are the big ones, the ones Christ himself established. Then there are five others which the church created under, we believe, the guidance of the Holy Spirit. One of those five is the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony.

Continue reading

Not ORPman’s Prayer: Sermon for Pentecost VII, Proper 12C – 27 July 2025

Do you all know what a tort is? Tort … T-O-R-T … no E on the end; I’m not talking about those wonderful little German or Austrian pastries. A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm to another person, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits the wrong. You leave a puddle of milk on the floor of your grocery store knowing it’s there, then someone slips in it and injures themselves: you have committed a tort. You speed through a stop sign, collide with another car, and injure the driver: you’ve not only broken the law, you’ve committed a tort.

A million years ago when I was in law school studying the law of torts with Professor Bill Lynch of blessed memory, I was introduced to the superhero of Anglo-American civil jurisprudence: the ordinary, reasonably prudent person, often called “ORPman”. ORPman’s super power, as you can tell from his name, is ordinary, reasonable prudence. His conduct is the standard against which allegedly tortious behavior is judged. His conduct is always sensible, never outrageous, not too timid, nor too bold. He is not a coward, but neither is he an excessive risk-taker. His expectations are rational; he is not demanding, but neither is he a doormat.

Continue reading

Come! See How We Play! Sermon for Pentecost –– 8 June 2025

Y’all know who John Wesley is, or was, I’m sure. The Anglican priest who founded Methodism? My paternal grandparents were Methodists and they really tried to make me into one but, for some reason, it didn’t stick. To this day when Evelyn and I visit a Methodist church, I will often turn to her as we are leaving and say, “There’s a reason I’m not a Methodist.”

Don’t get me wrong! Our church has an ongoing and productive ecumenical dialogue with the United Methodist Church and Methodists are fine people. I just don’t want to be one. There’s a reason I’m not a Methodist. To be honest, though, I wasn’t ever really sure what that reason was, but I was sure there must be one.

Continue reading

A Thought about Worship and Liturgy

This is probably going to come off as snarky criticism, but please take my word that I don’t mean it that way. It’s just that my diocese, the Episcopal Diocese of Ohio, promulgated a brochure-like document entitled “Vision Integration” at our most recent diocesan convention back in November. At the time, I didn’t pay it much attention: I’m retired, I’m not required to pay attention to these sorts of things any longer.

However, I more recently agreed to be part of a diocesan task force which, as I understand our mandate, is to develop one or two innovative programs or projects to assist our parishes with building maintenance and management issues. In preparation for our initial meeting, we were asked to review the “Vision Integration” document. Doing so, I have been reminded of a philosophical and spiritual position I have held about worship and liturgy for more than 35 years, which is to say “for longer than I’ve been an ordained person.” It is the belief that worship is central to the existence and mission of the church, moreso than any other ministry or activity the church may undertake. It is a position that is core to my ecclesiology, core to my understanding of the nature and purpose of the church.

Continue reading

Of Fisher Folk and Unity – Epiphany 5, RCL Year C

One of the things I try to do when I read the stories of Jesus in the Gospels, when he uses an odd or striking metaphor like “I will make you fishers of people”[1] or, as it is put in this Gospel, “from now on you will be catching people,”[2] is to figure out if he’s referring back to Law or the Prophets, and whether it might be the lectionary’s choice for a first lesson. Sometimes that helps me figure out whether there is a thematic link between the lessons and, if so, what it’s supposed tell us, but unfortunately that’s not the case today. Jesus doesn’t seem to have had Isaiah in mind when he summoned Peter and his business partners.

So for the past week or so, I’ve been pondering what might be the reason for putting the Isaiah reading –– which, although it comes in the sixth chapter, is the story of Isaiah’s initial call to be a prophet –– together with Luke’s version of Jesus recruiting Simon Peter and the sons of Zebedee, James and John, to be disciples. The simple answer, of course, is that they are both stories of calls to ministry, but they are so different!

Continue reading

Of Storytelling and Belief – Sermon for Proper 20, RCL Year B

“They’re eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats.”

That was the headline on the website of Raidió Teilifís Éireann, the national public broadcaster in the Republic of Ireland, on September 11. What the candidate in the U.S. presidential debate the night before had said in full was:

In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating, they’re eating the pets of the people that live there.[1]

As I’m sure you know, in the twelve days since the debate, the people of Springfield, Ohio, have been through hell. They’ve been put under a media microscope; white supremacists have marched through the town; there are have been more than 30 bomb threats against schools and public buildings.

Continue reading

Of Binary Thinking and Hope – Sermon for Proper 9, RCL Year B

We have had more than enough of contempt,
Too much of the scorn of the indolent rich,
and of the derision of the proud.[1]

Have you ever noticed how binary a document the Old Testament seems to be? Mike Kuhn, a professor of biblical theology at Arab Baptist Theological Seminary in Beirut, Lebanon, has pointed out that “the Bible is a book replete with binary categories: dark and light, the broad and narrow way, truth and lies, life and death, Jew and Gentile, etc.”[2] One could go on listing other opposed pairs described in the Hebrew Scriptures: the righteous and the unrighteous, the poor and the rich, the humble and the proud, us and them, God’s People and all those others. These are the categories we find in today’s gradual psalm, one of the fifteen Songs of Ascent, Psalms 120-134, which scholars believe are songs “the people of ancient Israel [sang as they] went on pilgrimage to the temple to worship … songs they sang as they traveled to express their faith.”[3] In this psalm, the dualism is between the malevolent wealthy and the faithful (and presumably poor) pilgrims who look to God for protection.

Continue reading

« Older posts